CanaryIQ uses privacy-friendly, cookieless analytics (Fathom) to understand aggregate site usage. We don't use tracking cookies, we don't sell or share your data, and we respect Global Privacy Control. See our Privacy Policy.

Quantum error correction

Experiments in controlling quantum errors are getting stronger, and how they are done matters as much as the qubit count. An IBM-linked study, revised in September, reports a verifiable fidelity bound after discarding runs with detected errors. That is useful progress, and continuously correcting errors while running an economical, general-purpose computation has yet to be shown.

high conviction emerging

Research snapshot · updated Nov 12, 2026

State of the art (2026)

Google's Willow chip showed in December 2024 that error correction works in practice. A distance-7 surface-code memory ran below the error threshold, and its logical qubit lasted longer than the best physical qubit on the chip. Real-time decoding was shown on a smaller, distance-5 memory. Quantinuum launched its Helios machine in November 2025. IBM's Starling plan targets 200 logical qubits running 100 million gates by 2029, using qLDPC codes to cut the number of physical qubits needed. Fault-tolerant computing at a commercially useful size has yet to be shown, and Microsoft's Majorana qubit claims remain disputed.

Logical qubit error rate replaces physical qubit count as headline metric

Google Willow Dec 2024 below-threshold demonstration set the framing. 2025-2026 vendor headlines (IBM Heron, Quantinuum Helios, PsiQuantum Omega) increasingly cite logical error rate (10^-3 to 10^-6) rather than physical qubit count. This is the right metric for usefulness: 200 logical qubits with 10^-9 error rate enable quantum chemistry simulations of small molecules; 10,000 physical qubits with 10^-3 error rate do not.

IBM Starling 2029 + PsiQuantum 2027-2028 + Quantinuum Helios are the three credible 100+ logical qubit paths

IBM Starling 2029 target: 200 logical qubits, 100M gates (publicly committed roadmap). PsiQuantum Brisbane 2027-2028 commercial fault-tolerant photonic device (with A$940M federal backstop). Quantinuum H2/Helios extension to ~100 logical qubits 2027 (trapped-ion scaling depends on multi-chamber architecture). Microsoft + AWS + Atom Computing + QuEra are credible but with less explicit 100+ logical milestone commitment.

Magic state factory throughput becomes the new bottleneck

Surface codes don't natively support T-gates → magic state distillation factories required, ~10:1 overhead per T-gate. Quantinuum + IBM + Google demonstrated factory preparation 2025-2026. Algorithmic improvements (game-changing biased-noise codes, transversal magic state injection) over the next 24 months determine whether useful applications need 10⁵ or 10⁶ logical qubits.

Explore the deeper analysis in CanaryIQ

Explore what is covered below. These previews show the structure; log in to read the full analysis.

Signal stack

Evidence stacked leading → lagging

9 signals
talent
research
patent
expert
operational
regulatory
market

Technology-native KPIs

Metrics that predict trajectory, tracked over time

4 tracked
Quantinuum Helios logical qubit performance
IBM Starling 2029 target
Google Willow QEC milestone
PsiQuantum Brisbane facility

Landscape map

Who builds what, and who depends on whom

75 players · 6 layers

Catalyst calendar

Dated events that will move the position

8 ahead

Technology roadmap

Milestones on the path to maturity

8 milestones

Watchlists

Companies, people and papers, each with a condition for removing it

20 · 2
Companies · 20
People · 2

Decision frameworks

What our view means for your job

Locked
Public Equity
PE / VC
Corporate Leader

Thesis changelog

When our view changed, and why

9 updates

Change our mind

5 disconfirming conditions

You've read the verdict. The file is much deeper.

The full signal stack, technology-native KPIs tracked over time, the landscape of who depends on whom, the dated catalyst calendar, decision frameworks for every desk, live watchlists and a record of every time our view on Quantum error correction has changed. All of it is in CanaryIQ.