Hypersonic weapons
US hypersonics has moved towards production. The Army reports a March 2026 contract that combines development and production for the common glide-body programme. A contract comes before delivered equipment, and delivered equipment comes before operational readiness. It tells us nothing about how countries rank or whether effective defences exist.
Research snapshot · updated Nov 12, 2026
Core thesis
Hypersonic missiles combine the speed of ballistic missiles with the manoeuvrability of cruise missiles, defeating current interceptors. China (DF-17, and the now-operational DF-27 conventional ICBM) and Russia (Avangard, Kinzhal, Zircon) field the largest deployed inventories. The US crossed into deployment in 2025 – the Army activated its first Dark Eagle battery and the Navy installed Conventional Prompt Strike on USS Zumwalt – but trails on fielded numbers. The contest now shifts to defence, where no proven interceptor against a manoeuvring glide vehicle yet exists. Thermal protection materials remain a constraint: tungsten and advanced ceramics are critical, and Chinese export controls on tungsten directly affect Western development.
State of the art (2026)
The US has finally fielded. The Army activated its first Dark Eagle (LRHW) battery at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in late 2025 and forward-deployed launchers to Australia for Talisman Sabre; the Navy completed Conventional Prompt Strike tube installation on USS Zumwalt in late 2025, which returns to sea in 2026 as the first US hypersonic-armed warship. China and Russia remain ahead in fielded inventory – the DF-27 anti-ship glide vehicle is now in service and Avangard, Kinzhal and Zircon are operational. The decisive 2026 shift is defensive: the roughly $185B Golden Dome programme, announced May 2025, accelerated Northrop Grumman’s Glide Phase Interceptor (now a 1.3B-plus OTA) toward a 2028 flight milestone. The race is moving from who can strike to who can stop it.
Explore the deeper analysis in CanaryIQ
Explore what is covered below. These previews show the structure; log in to read the full analysis.
Signal stack
Evidence stacked leading → lagging
8 signals
Signal stack
Evidence stacked leading → lagging
Technology-native KPIs
Metrics that predict trajectory, tracked over time
4 tracked
Technology-native KPIs
Metrics that predict trajectory, tracked over time
Landscape map
Who builds what, and who depends on whom
26 players · 5 layers
Landscape map
Who builds what, and who depends on whom
Catalyst calendar
Dated events that will move the position
3 ahead
Catalyst calendar
Dated events that will move the position
Technology roadmap
Milestones on the path to maturity
8 milestones
Technology roadmap
Milestones on the path to maturity
Watchlists
Companies, people and papers, each with a condition for removing it
20 · 20
Watchlists
Companies, people and papers, each with a condition for removing it
Decision frameworks
What our view means for your job
Locked
Decision frameworks
What our view means for your job
Thesis changelog
When our view changed, and why
7 updates
Thesis changelog
When our view changed, and why
Change our mind
3 disconfirming conditions
You've read the verdict. The file is much deeper.
The full signal stack, technology-native KPIs tracked over time, the landscape of who depends on whom, the dated catalyst calendar, decision frameworks for every desk, live watchlists and a record of every time our view on Hypersonic weapons has changed. All of it is in CanaryIQ.