CanaryIQ uses privacy-friendly, cookieless analytics (Fathom) to understand aggregate site usage. We don't use tracking cookies, we don't sell or share your data, and we respect Global Privacy Control. See our Privacy Policy.

Counter-drone systems

Counter-drone is one of the fastest-growing areas of defence spending. In 2026 cheap interceptor drones did most of the work against swarms; lasers, microwaves and jamming help, and Patriot-class missiles are still needed against ballistic missiles. Drones like these still use Chinese parts: Ukraine cut China's share of its imported drone parts from about 90% in early 2024 to 28% in January to August 2026, and China requires export licences for drone motors and flight controllers from 18 November 2026.

high conviction growth

Research snapshot · updated Nov 10, 2026

Core thesis

Ukraine war demonstrated that $500 FPV drones can destroy $10M tanks. Traditional air defence (Patriot at $4M/missile) is economically unsustainable against drone swarms. Solutions: directed energy (laser at $1-10/shot), electronic warfare (RF jamming), interceptor drones, and AI-powered detection/tracking. Israel's Iron Beam is the most advanced laser counter-drone system. The market is growing 25%+ annually. The fundamental shift: air defence must become as cheap as the threat it faces.

State of the art (2026)

Armies now buy defences against drones in layers: jammers, guns, interceptor drones, microwave weapons and lasers. In December 2025 Israel's defence ministry said it had delivered the first operational Iron Beam laser to its armed forces. In July 2025 the US Army ordered Epirus's Leonidas microwave system, which is designed to disable many drones at once. In March 2026 the US Army gave Anduril a ten-year contract worth up to $20 billion. That figure is the most the Army may order. It is not an amount it has ordered. In August 2025 the Pentagon set up a new joint task force, JIATF 401, to run its work against small drones. Stopping a large number of drones arriving together, at a cost lower than the drones themselves, is still an unsolved problem.

Explore the deeper analysis in CanaryIQ

Explore what is covered below. These previews show the structure; log in to read the full analysis.

Signal stack

Evidence stacked leading → lagging

8 signals
talent
research
patent
expert
operational
market

Technology-native KPIs

Metrics that predict trajectory, tracked over time

4 tracked
YoY market growth rate
Drone incursion incidents reported
Global C-UAS market size
US DoD C-UAS budget

Landscape map

Who builds what, and who depends on whom

85 players · 6 layers

Catalyst calendar

Dated events that will move the position

3 ahead

Technology roadmap

Milestones on the path to maturity

7 milestones

Watchlists

Companies, people and papers, each with a condition for removing it

20 · 19
Companies · 20
People · 19

Decision frameworks

What our view means for your job

Locked
Public Equity
PE / VC
Corporate Leader

Thesis changelog

When our view changed, and why

7 updates

Change our mind

3 disconfirming conditions

You've read the verdict. The file is much deeper.

The full signal stack, technology-native KPIs tracked over time, the landscape of who depends on whom, the dated catalyst calendar, decision frameworks for every desk, live watchlists and a record of every time our view on Counter-drone systems has changed. All of it is in CanaryIQ.