CanaryIQ uses privacy-friendly, cookieless analytics (Fathom) to understand aggregate site usage. We don't use tracking cookies, we don't sell or share your data, and we respect Global Privacy Control. See our Privacy Policy.

Tidal and wave energy

Wave and tidal developers have set out plans to cut costs. They have not yet shown they can match offshore wind on cost. The test is repeatable output, maintenance and delivered cost from successive projects. Until then, neither the roadmaps nor permanent uncompetitiveness is fact.

low conviction concept

Research snapshot · updated Nov 12, 2026

State of the art (2026)

Tidal stream is the more advanced of the two. MeyGen in the Pentland Firth runs four turbines with 6 MW of capacity, and Orbital Marine's O2 floating turbine supplies the Orkney grid. In wave power, CorPower Ocean has connected its C4 device to the grid at Aguçadoura in Portugal. The UK government published the results of its seventh contract auction round (AR7) on 14 January 2026 and updated them on 10 February. We do not have a confirmed figure for how the budget open to tidal projects changed in that round. Both technologies still cost considerably more than offshore wind.

Tidal stream is more commercial than wave energy

SAE Renewables MeyGen 6 MW operational since 2017 (longest commercial tidal-stream record). Orbital Marine O2 floating 2 MW commercial. Nova Innovation + Verdant Power. Tidal predictable energy production + lower mechanical complexity than wave. Wave energy stays research-pilot.

UK + EU CfD + leasing support sustains demonstration programmes

UK Pot 4/5/6 CfD contracts + Crown Estate Scotland leasing + EU + France + Ireland support. Demonstration programmes funded through 2027-2028. Without sustained government support, commercial pathway closes.

Niche island + remote + grid-stabilisation applications

Orkney + Shetland + Tasmania + Gibraltar deployments demonstrate niche applications where conventional grid uneconomical + tidal/wave predictable energy useful for grid stabilisation. ~$2-3B contract pipeline over 5 years.

Explore the deeper analysis in CanaryIQ

Explore what is covered below. These previews show the structure; log in to read the full analysis.

Signal stack

Evidence stacked leading → lagging

9 signals
talent
research
patent
expert
operational
regulatory
market

Technology-native KPIs

Metrics that predict trajectory, tracked over time

4 tracked
SAE Renewables MeyGen Scotland
Orbital Marine O2
Tidal LCOE vs offshore wind
UK + EU + Canada contract pipeline

Landscape map

Who builds what, and who depends on whom

175 players · 6 layers

Catalyst calendar

Dated events that will move the position

7 ahead

Technology roadmap

Milestones on the path to maturity

7 milestones

Watchlists

Companies, people and papers, each with a condition for removing it

20 · 19
Companies · 20
People · 19

Decision frameworks

What our view means for your job

Locked
Public Equity
PE / VC
Corporate Leader

Thesis changelog

When our view changed, and why

9 updates

Change our mind

5 disconfirming conditions

You've read the verdict. The file is much deeper.

The full signal stack, technology-native KPIs tracked over time, the landscape of who depends on whom, the dated catalyst calendar, decision frameworks for every desk, live watchlists and a record of every time our view on Tidal and wave energy has changed. All of it is in CanaryIQ.